首页> 外文OA文献 >Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis
【2h】

Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis

机译:减少社区获得性肺炎的上门抗生素时间:可控的前后评估和成本效益分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Practice guidelines suggest that all patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) should receive antibiotics within 4 h of admission. An audit at our hospital during 1999–2000 showed that this target was achieved in less than two thirds of patients with severe CAP. Methods: An experienced multidisciplinary steering group designed a management pathway to improve the early delivery of appropriate antibiotics to patients with CAP. This was implemented using a multifaceted strategy. The effect of implementation was evaluated using a controlled before-and-after study design over two winter seasons (November–April 2001–2 and 2002–3). Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed from the hospital’s perspective. Results: The proportion of patients receiving appropriate antibiotics within 4 h of admission to hospital increased from 33% to 56% at the intervention site, and from 32% to 36% at the control site (absolute change adjusted for differences in severity of illness 17%, p?=?0.035). The cost per additional patient receiving appropriate antibiotics within 4 h was £132 with no post-implementation evaluation, and £456 for a limited post-implementation evaluation. Simple modelling from the results of a large observational study suggests that the cost per death prevented could be £3003 with no post-implementation evaluation, or £16 632 with a limited post-implementation evaluation. Conclusions: The intervention markedly improved door-to-antibiotic time, albeit at considerable cost. It might still be a cost-effective strategy, however, to reduce mortality in CAP. Uncertainty about the cost effectiveness of such interventions is likely to be resolved only by a well-designed, cluster randomised trial.
机译:背景:实践指南建议所有住院的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者应在入院后4小时内接受抗生素治疗。我们医院在1999–2000年期间进行的一项审核显示,只有不到三分之二的严重CAP患者实现了该目标。方法:一个经验丰富的多学科指导小组设计了一种管理途径,以改善向CAP患者早期应用合适的抗生素的过程。这是使用多方面的策略实现的。在两个冬季(2001年2月至2001年4月2日和2002年3月3日),采用前后对照研究设计,评估了实施效果。从医院的角度进行了成本效益分析。结果:入院4小时内接受适当抗生素治疗的患者比例在干预部位从33%增加到56%,在对照部位从32%增加到36%(根据疾病严重程度的差异调整了绝对变化17 %,p≥0.035)。每位额外的患者在4小时内接受适当抗生素的费用为132英镑(未进行实施后评估),而费用为456英镑(进行有限的实施后评估)。一项大型观察性研究结果的简单建模表明,没有实施后评估的每人死亡成本可能为3003英镑,而实施后评估有限的单人死亡成本则为16632英镑。结论:尽管成本高昂,但该干预措施显着缩短了上门应用抗生素的时间。但是,降低CAP的死亡率仍然可能是一种具有成本效益的策略。只有通过精心设计的整群随机试验才能解决有关此类干预措施成本效益的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号